Yes, we have to allocate some, e.g. commodities, provisional and regulatory ecosystem services, oil, coal, water, natural gas, soil, crops for feeding, but are we allowed to do them at a certain level requested by our next generation? Next generation has no opportunity to communicate with their ancestors, that is us. When they mention us we will be under topsoil in graveyards resembling inanimate, abiotic components of ecosystems. Are we allowed to achieve this even for our relatives, families, friends, classmates? Forces exerted upon on us, and vunerable ecosystems do not allow us, because we are the majority, obliged to obey the rules of the minority. Do we have freedom to protect present natural systems, and resources to save the next generations beforehand? Today's power prevents us to make better decisions, implementing rational policies for the future of all human beings. Such threats are being considered by the World Conservation Union, IUCN, IPBES, CBD, but can not be described, publicized, or declared by them. We are not free to become a responsible ancestor; we have been suppressed particularly in the centuries. When Marx explains something on former political systems challenging world people, the poor working class, this threat has been started at that time, though not felt by our ancestors. We had not so many data enough revealing today's situation at that time, so not responsible from the ongoing worsened situation. First and easily perceviable concern here are environment, and peace for transmitting to new generations. We ancestors received rather good heritage, but we cannot remain a comparable degree of heritage to F1, F2, F3 generations and so forth. No, this is not due to our indifference, but the overload of our planet felt by us at present. Remember that in early centuries the size, energy, biomass of the world is the same as today, whereas fortunately world population was so small compared to present time. So please do not feel guilty. We should ask ourselves some relevant questions: for instance do we have some powerful remedy tools to pass along resources to be used by next generations? To achieve this, first we should have a little bit power required acting at least for today, but we have no power to influence present inconvenient policy implementations. I mean, ancestors of future generations, that is people living at the present time do not have enough capacity though wishing to provide health, and wealth for them. Escaping from such frustrating desperate situations is not possible, our personalities cannot bear these kinds of weaknesses, dilemma. An intermediate, transitionary solution would be divergence from this inferiority complex toward mystic interpretations, sentimentalism, exaggerating our feelings, limiting ourselves fix to nostalgic feelings, and spiritual interpretations when replying this question. Literature, mystery of wild landscape, children and domestic animals, i.e. pets help us in hampering our such psychological load. Nonetheless, we ancestors of future populations (both human beings, and wildlife) will still stay in a position of entropy unfortunately would be quite bigger compared to present. We ancestors have been managed by some concrete forces, so have no chance to sustain lives of future ecosystems, wildlife populations, and human populations. Perhaps our responsibility may enforce us to consume less in order not to exploit the legal sources of future generations. Notice that environmental economy respects their rights by defining the term, bequest value in biodiversity valuation. Yes, we may wish their welfare, happiness, and health, but cannot achieve this, because even we cannot advocate, and protect our natural ecosystem provisions today. Our, their ancestors' right is the right of future generations. Really, can we cooperate with future generations yet not alive, they are spending their lives in pre-birth stage. We should overcome this actually by the present time corresponding instruments defined by my symbolical, and ironic expression.